Audit readiness
An audit asks two questions about each standard: do you have it, and does it actually happen. This checklist covers the first one. It lists what the Practice Standards' quality indicators say you should be able to show, in the order the standards put them, so you can find the gaps before an auditor does.
This is a plain-English explanation, not legal or industrial-relations advice, and not a substitute for the sources it links. Rules and rates change. Check anything you are about to act on against the source, or ask someone qualified.
Checked against these on 4 October 2026. They are the authority; this page is a summary of them.
NDIS Commission. The quality audit process →
NDIS Commission. Core module: Provider governance and operational management →
NDIS Commission. Core module: Rights and responsibilities →
NDIS Commission. Core module: Provision of supports →
NDIS Commission. Core module: Provision of supports environment →
NDIS Commission. Verification module →
A verification audit is for lower-risk, lower-complexity supports. The Commission describes it as a desktop review of the documentary evidence listed in its Required Documentation Guide.
A certification audit is for higher-risk supports and has two stages. Stage 1 is a desktop audit, usually off-site, where the auditor asks for information and evidence. Stage 2 is on-site, where the auditor looks at how you are implementing your policies and procedures. That can mean viewing records, visiting sites, interviewing staff and participants, and observing. Stage 2 should take place within three months of Stage 1. A provider who first completed a certification audit has a mid-term audit 18 months into the registration period.
Each indicator is rated from 3 (conforms, with elements of best practice) down to 0 (a major non-conformity). The Commission says a major non-conformity gives you three months to fix it, and a minor one a longer time. Participant sampling is opt-out: you tell every participant they are included, and record and pass on anyone who opts out.
So the lists below are the floor, not the finish. Stage 2 is about what actually happens: the auditor follows a record back to the shift, the worker and the participant it came from.
The core module's governance standards carry most of the documents an auditor asks for first. Their quality indicators point to:
The human resource management standard is where an auditor samples staff files. Its indicators point to:
The provision of supports standards, and the rights standards around them, point to records held for each person:
Where these apply to the supports you deliver, the environment standards point to:
The verification module is shorter. Its indicators point to records of each worker's identity, right to work, pre-employment checks and qualifications, the NDIS orientation module and continuing professional development; an incident management system and a complaints management and resolution system, each complying with its 2018 Rules; a documented risk management system for work health and safety risks that includes emergency and disaster planning; appropriate insurance; and regular risk assessments.
The Commission's Required Documentation Guide, linked from the verification module page, lists the documentary evidence a verification auditor reviews.
CareOp is where the shifts, notes, credentials and incidents happen, so most of the records above are kept as the work is done rather than gathered before an audit. Your readiness against the Practice Standards is worked out from those records whenever you look, an internal audit records the gaps as findings with a corrective action plan, and an auditor can be given a link to a read-only portal that expires by itself.
The quality standards registered providers are audited against, covering rights, governance, service delivery and the support environment.
The independent assessment of a registered provider against the Practice Standards, on a cycle and by an approved auditor.
The separate regulator for provider quality and participant safety: registration, the Practice Standards, the Code of Conduct, reportable incidents and restrictive practices.
The clearance a worker needs to do certain roles, issued by a state or territory and checkable against a national database.
The agreement between a provider and a participant setting out what supports will be delivered and on what terms.
An incident of a kind the NDIS Commission must be told about, which starts a notification deadline and a separate deadline for a fuller report.
Anything that has the effect of restricting a person's rights or freedom of movement. Five kinds are regulated: chemical, physical, mechanical, environmental and seclusion.
NDIS Commission. The quality audit process →
NDIS Commission. Core module: Provider governance and operational management →
NDIS Commission. Core module: Rights and responsibilities →
NDIS Commission. Core module: Provision of supports →
NDIS Commission. Core module: Provision of supports environment →
NDIS Commission. Verification module →
Every primary document an Australian provider needs is indexed and dated on the reference library.
The two SCHADS rules a community roster breaks most often
Read it →Two clocks, both starting the moment you become aware
Read it →Five regulated kinds, and the obligation that outlives the record
Read it →