Compared

CareOp compared with Astalty

Astalty is the most established product in this category and the comparison most providers ask us about. They are ahead of us in several concrete places, so we have put those first.

Assessed August 2026 from 465 pages of Astalty's own published documentation. Their product changes; check anything decisive with them directly.

Where Astalty is ahead

Astalty is ahead of us in places that will matter to some providers and we are not going to bury them: they lodge to the NDIA through PRODA where ours is a file you upload, they sync both ways with Xero where ours exports one way, and they have a free plan, 1,400-odd businesses and public reviews where we are new and have none of that. The table below has all of it, including the rows we lose.

Where we are ahead.

Safeguarding is built, not adjacent

A reportable incident opens its clock the moment it is logged, and a scan inside the database moves it along every hour and escalates it when nobody picks it up. Plus a restrictive-practices register carrying each practice's authorisation state and a review date it watches for you. These are properties of the record, not reminders somebody set, and it is the widest gap between the two products.

Clinical records and medications

Medication records, health records and clinical documentation all sit on the participant. Astalty does not carry any of it. If you deliver personal care with medication support, that one line is probably the whole decision and you can stop reading here.

Your award rates, not the textbook ones

Your casual loading and on-cost gross-up are your own effective-dated numbers, so five specific SCHADS breaches get checked and priced at your rates while the roster is still a draft. One limit worth stating: the overtime multipliers stay at the award's 1.5× and 2×, so an agreement that varies those is not expressible yet.

Readiness computed live, and scans that run overnight

Your score against the Practice Standards is computed from what the system can see, every time you open it — so it cannot go stale between refreshes. Separately, overnight scans walk your obligations, credentials, documents and risk reviews. Evidence packs assemble on demand, and the auditor portal is read-only and expires on its own.

The whole table, losses included.

The rows we lose are in here too. If they were not, you would be right not to believe the rows we win.

CapabilityCareOpAstalty
Rostering and service modelYesYes
Support-worker mobile appYesYes
Offline mobileYesNo
Reportable-incident 24-hour timersTheirs is incident recording without the escalating statutory clock.YesPartial
Restrictive-practices registerYesPartial
Medications and clinical recordsYesNo
SCHADS award engineAstalty raises award alerts; interpretation depth differs.YesPartial
Audit readiness and evidence packsYesPartial
Participant-level marginYesNo
Payment reconciliationYesYes
PRODA / NDIA bulk-claim lodgementOurs is a PACE-ready file you upload. Theirs is an integrated pipeline.PartialYes
Two-way Xero syncWe export. Two-way sync is not built.NoYes
STP payroll lodgementWe calculate SCHADS pay; neither of us lodges STP for you today.PartialPartial
Free or self-serve tierTheir Lite plan is free. Ours is in draft pricing and not live yet.NoYes
Published pricingNoYes

So which one should you pick?

Go with Astalty if…

PRODA lodgement and two-way Xero are decisive for you today, if you want a genuinely free tier to start on, or if a long customer list and public reviews are how you sensibly de-risk picking a vendor.

Go with us if…

you deliver personal care with medication support, if reportable incidents and restrictive practices are a weekly reality rather than an edge case, or if the award and the next audit are the two things you actually lose sleep over.

The other one.

Or stop reading comparisons and just look at it.

Try it free — up to 5 people